Consistency Model in Distributed System

Consistency protocols in distributed systems ensure data coherence & reliability

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

 A consistency model defines the level of agreement or uniformity that should be maintained across different nodes in a distributed system regarding the state of data. It outlines the rules that govern how and when updates made to one part of the system become visible to other parts. There are various types of consistency models, each offering a different approach to handling data synchronization in distributed systems.

Choosing the right consistency model depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the application. Some systems prioritize immediate uniformity (strong consistency), while others prioritize availability and partition tolerance, accepting the possibility of temporary inconsistencies that will eventually be resolved (eventual consistency).

Consistency Model in Distributed System: All you need to know

A consistency model in the distributed system is akin to the glue that holds the intricate web of interconnected components together. It refers to a set of rules and guarantees that dictate how data is updated, accessed, and maintained in a distributed system.

In the context of distributed computing, where multiple interconnected nodes work together to process and store data, ensuring consistency is crucial for reliable and accurate operations. Here comes the role of the consistency model. In this blog, we are going to focus on the relevance of consistency protocols in distributed systems.

What are consistency protocols in distributed systems?

Consistency protocols in distributed systems are sets of rules, algorithms, and mechanisms designed to ensure that the data stored across multiple nodes is consistent. In distributed computing, where data is processed and stored on different interconnected machines, maintaining consistency is a complex challenge.

Consistency protocols aim to address issues related to the coordination and synchronization of data updates across distributed nodes. These protocols help manage the trade-offs between consistency, availability, and partition tolerance, as outlined by the CAP theorem (Consistency, Availability, Partition tolerance).

Here are some key points related to consistency protocols:

Two-Phase Commit (2PC)

This protocol ensures atomicity in distributed transactions. It involves a coordinator who communicates with all nodes participating in a transaction. In the first phase, nodes agree or disagree to commit, and in the second phase, the actual commit or rollback occurs based on the first-phase responses.

Paxos Protocol

Paxos is a consensus algorithm used to achieve agreement among a network of distributed nodes. It ensures that a group of nodes reaches consensus on a single value, even if some nodes may fail or experience delays.

Quorum-based Systems

In systems using quorums, a certain number of nodes must agree on an operation for it to be considered successful. This approach allows for flexibility in terms of availability and partition tolerance while still providing a level of consistency.

Vector Clocks

Vector clocks are used to track the causality of events in a distributed system. Each node maintains a vector, and during events, the vector is updated to reflect the ordering of events. This helps in determining the partial ordering of events across nodes.

CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types)

CRDTs are data structures designed to be replicated across multiple nodes without the need for coordination. They allow for concurrent updates without introducing conflicts, ensuring eventual consistency.

Raft Consensus Algorithm

Similar to Paxos, Raft is another consensus algorithm that ensures the consistency of distributed systems. It simplifies the understanding and implementation of distributed consensus compared to Paxos.

These protocols play a vital role in managing the complexities of distributed systems, where nodes may experience failures, network partitions, or delays. By providing a structured way to handle coordination and communication, consistency protocols contribute to the reliable and robust operation of distributed systems.

Common types of consistency models

Strong Consistency

strong consistency model

In a system with strong consistency, all nodes see the same data at the same time. It is also known as strict consistency in the distributed system.

This model is characterized by its unique feature that guarantees immediate and uniform access to the most recent update.

Example: Traditional relational databases often adhere to strong consistency.

Eventual Consistency

Eventual consistency allows temporary variations in data across nodes but ensures that, given enough time and no further updates, all nodes will converge to a consistent state.

It prioritizes availability and partition tolerance over immediate consistency.

For example, NoSQL databases like Cassandra and DynamoDB often implement eventual consistency.

Causal Consistency

Causal consistency ensures that operations that are causally related are seen by all nodes in the same order.

This model provides a balance between strong and eventual consistency by maintaining causality.

Example: Some distributed systems, like Riak, use causal consistency to handle dependencies between operations.

Sequential Consistency

In a system with sequential consistency, the result of any execution is equivalent to a sequential execution of all operations.

It guarantees a consistent order of operations, resembling the behavior of a single-threaded system.

Example: Shared-memory systems often follow sequential consistency.

Bounded Staleness Consistency

Bounded staleness consistency allows a system to provide guarantees on the maximum staleness of the data.

This model balances the need for consistency with the desire for low-latency access to data.

Example: Microsoft Azure’s Cosmos DB allows users to configure bounded staleness.

Read-your-writes Consistency

read writes consistency

This model ensures that any write operation performed by a user is immediately visible to them during subsequent read operations.

The read-your-writes consistency model provides a strong guarantee for individual users’ interactions with the system.

Example: Many web applications implement read-your-writes consistency to give users an up-to-date view of their actions.

Monotonic Consistency

Monotonic consistency ensures that once a user sees a particular value for a data item, subsequent accesses will not return older values.

It guarantees a monotonic progression in the values seen by a user.

Example: Google’s Spanner database system adheres to monotonic consistency.

PRAM Consistency

PRAM (Parallel Random-Access Machine) consistency is a theoretical model ensuring that operations appear to be executed instantaneously at some point between their invocation and response.

Example: Often used in theoretical discussions and algorithm design.

Understanding these consistency models is essential for architects and developers working on distributed systems, as the choice of model greatly influences the behavior and performance of the system in various scenarios.

Frequently asked questions

What is protocol in distributed systems?

A protocol in distributed systems refers to a set of rules, conventions, and procedures defining communication and interaction between nodes. It governs how nodes coordinate, share information, and ensure the integrity of data exchanges in the complex environment of distributed computing.

What is sequential consistency in distributed systems?

It ensures that the results of any execution are equivalent to those of a sequential execution of all operations. This model guarantees a consistent order of operations across nodes. Thus, it resembles the behavior of a single-threaded system, despite the parallel and distributed nature of the system.

How do consistency models handle network latency?

Network latency can impact consistency. Models may incorporate strategies to mitigate delays and ensure synchronization across distributed nodes.

Wrapping it up !!!

Understanding and implementing a data-centric consistency model is crucial for designing distributed systems that balance the need for data accuracy with the demands of scalability and performance. By tailoring consistency rules to the characteristics of individual data entities, this model provides a nuanced approach to managing data in a distributed environment.

Master the concepts of data consistency with Pickl.AI

Pickl.AI is a trusted ed-tech platform offering Data Science courses that encompass all the tools and concepts that help you become proficient in it.  One can explore Data Science courses for beginners as well and professionals can opt for a Job Guarantee course in Data Science

to upgrade their skill set. For more information, log on to Pickl.AI 


  • Rahul Kumar

    Written by:

    I am Rahul Kumar final year student at NIT Jamshedpur currently working as Data Science Intern. I am dedicated individual with a knack of learning new things.